summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/content/reviews/movies/part-two-2024.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'content/reviews/movies/part-two-2024.md')
-rw-r--r--content/reviews/movies/part-two-2024.md128
1 files changed, 128 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/content/reviews/movies/part-two-2024.md b/content/reviews/movies/part-two-2024.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b618e0f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/content/reviews/movies/part-two-2024.md
@@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
++++
+title = "Dune: Part Two (2024)"
+author = ["MichaƂ Sapka"]
+date = 2024-04-16T16:44:00+02:00
+categories = ["reviews"]
+draft = false
+weight = 2013
+reviewSection = ["Movies"]
+image_dir = "reviews/screenshots"
+image_max_width = 765
+abstract = "My review of an adaptation of the second part of an amazing book"
+aliases = ["/brain-rot/dune/part-two-2024", "brain-rot/american-scifi/dune/part-two-2024/"]
+rating = 4.75
+image = "reviews/covers/dune2.jpg"
+related = ["Dune movies"]
+relatedName = "Dune: Part Two (2024)"
++++
+
+It's here, it's finally here.
+_Dune_ joins the very small club of SciFi books with amazing adaptations.
+When _Part One_ hit the screens, people were amazed that it was so good.
+Now, with _Part Two_, we hear that it's even better than the first one!
+
+But I was very skeptical.
+The trailers seemed to indicate a train wreck.
+They were full of explosions, angry screaming guys and the taglines about war.
+Dune was never _about_ war.
+War was in there, but it was never the point.
+But cinema, SciFi especially, loves special effects, and big-booms are amongst the most used.
+I dislike a lot of SciFi movies from the USA, as the (so called) spectacle is all there is[^fn:1].
+
+But what the hell, I chose an IMAX experience nevertheless.
+The first _Dune_ was breathtaking, so why not?
+
+And then the movie started, and my worries were replaced with anger.
+What the hell is this?
+Soldier banter?
+Puppy-eyes?
+Joking?
+It's a SciFi war movie.
+There are preparing for the _specle_
+_Dirty Fremen Dozen_!
+_Independence Day of Arrakis_!
+
+But, just as the action moved to Giedi Prime, the movie completely transformed.
+What was mediocre, became absolutely marvelous!
+
+Now, after seeing and rethinking the movie, it makes sense.
+It's a not _sequel_ to _Dune_, but _part two_.
+It doesn't start in act 1, as that was in the last movie.
+The first chunk of this movie is a cool-down after the ending in of _Part One_.
+Both _Dune_ movies should be treated as one long movie.
+Much more than Kill Bill, as we have no clear _ending_ between the two.
+_Part One_ ends with finishing of the Harkonen attack plot, which only ignites events of this movie.
+And looking at it as one one big movie, I have to say: wow!
+
+They made some changes to Herbert's text, but I like them.
+Fremen are no longer a singular force that Paul uses.
+The movie version of them is divided, having different cultures.
+Maybe it's too black and white, but it's a nice change.
+
+Similarly, Chani become a multidimensional character.
+And while yes, Jessicas portrayal makes Chanis character shine much less, it's still a great change.
+But the way Rebecca Ferguson plays Jessica is nothing short of wonder.
+She starts scared, but loyal to both, Paul and Bene Gesserit.
+After becoming the reverent mother however she becomes menacing.
+With this comes another change - Alia is not born here.
+She is talking with her mother telepathically, but at the end of the movie she is still to be born[^fn:2].
+That's a dangerous change, but it works perfectly because the tone Jessica uses when talking with her - calm, silent, almost a whisper, yet still menacing.
+I can not stress it enough - Rebecca is perfect here.
+
+But the biggest change is the introduction of scenes from _Dune Messiah_.
+You see, _Dune_ was often seen as a savior story.
+Paul was to be the good guy, who comes and saves the day.
+This is as far from what Frank Herbert envisioned as possible, so he wrote a short sequel book.
+This movie vision introduces plot points and scenes taken directly from that book, so the meaning behing the story is much more obvious.
+I think it's a good change, as we already see folks arguing against _Dune_ due to this misconception.
+This way it defends itself.
+
+{{< image class="centered" file="dune-part2-001.jpg" >}}
+Arrakis 90210
+{{< /image >}}
+
+{{< image class="centered" file="dune-part2-002.jpg" >}}
+Jessica in all of her glory
+{{< /image >}}
+
+Luckily, this movie is much weirder than _Part One_.
+While last time Dennis omitted a lot, here he shows more _things_[^fn:3], but still there is no context.
+We see the finger of the Baron, but we never learn what actually is there.
+It comes as an Easter Egg for old time fans, which is nice as it takes nothing from the story.
+But then there is Geidi Prime which is monochromatic, empty and cold - in the scariest way.
+I'd love to see more of this side the world, but we got it spot on.
+And Fayd?
+Where Lynch gave us half-naked Sting, Austin Butler is a psychopath.
+This is the Beast we all deserve!
+This is the stuff nightmares are made of.
+
+I am happy to report that this is not a war movie.
+It's _Dune_ full of plots within plots, mysticism and (lastly) war.
+
+Unfortunately, once again I am not happy with the music.
+While most of the tracks are good (or great), the main theme is even worse than last time.
+It's now layered over a lot more noise, making it this much more annoying.
+It decreased my enjoyment of many of the greatest scenes.
+Luckily, there is also new theme so this screaming woman may not follow us into the third movie.
+
+So, _Dune Part II_ is an excellent movie, but _Dune_ the complete story is a marvel.
+It's the greatest thing I've seen in American SciFi in a very long time.
+It's what it should be.
+While not flawless, it's as close to what I'd imagine as a _perfect_ _Dune_ as it comes.
+The movie gets a 4.75 from me (same as the first one), but looking at both _Dunes_ as a single movie?
+Then it goes to a 5.
+I don't think we will get anywhere close to this level of quality anytime soon.
+What _Baldurs Gate III_ made for cRPG, _Dune_ makes to _SciFi cinema_.
+
+And, I love that Christofer Walken is once again in the Dune universe.
+He warned us about the Worm years ago.
+
+Fayd in all of his glory
+\#+end_image
+
+[^fn:1]: I still remember how bored I was when I watched _Iron Man 3_.
+ The last decade of the movie runtime was filled with a non-stop battle.
+ The movie stopped and all was left was CGI.
+[^fn:2]: Kinda fitting.
+ _Arrival_ had a very similar take on what a human is.
+[^fn:3]: No chairdogs though