diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'content/reviews/books/andrzej-sapkowskis-tower-of-swallow.md')
-rw-r--r-- | content/reviews/books/andrzej-sapkowskis-tower-of-swallow.md | 70 |
1 files changed, 70 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/content/reviews/books/andrzej-sapkowskis-tower-of-swallow.md b/content/reviews/books/andrzej-sapkowskis-tower-of-swallow.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..dfb6b15 --- /dev/null +++ b/content/reviews/books/andrzej-sapkowskis-tower-of-swallow.md @@ -0,0 +1,70 @@ ++++ +title = "Tower of the Swallow (Andrzej Sapkowski, 1997)" +author = ["MichaĆ Sapka"] +date = 2024-05-25T22:11:00+02:00 +categories = ["reviews"] +draft = false +weight = 2008 +reviewSection = ["Books"] +abstract = "My review of the 4th book in the Witcher saga" +rating = 4.25 +image = "reviews/covers/sapkowski-tower-of-swallow.jpg" +related = ["Witcher Saga"] +relatedName = "Tower of the Swallow" +aliases = ["brain-rot/fantasy/witcher/andrzej-sapkowskis-tower-of-swallow/"] ++++ + +It's hard to overestimate how popular the Witcher books were amongst polish youth in the 90s. +Everyone talked about it, the books were borrowed everywhere[^fn:1]. +And yet I have never read it. +Now, in 2024, I am so close to no longer being a _bad Pole_. + +_The Tower of Swallow_ starts with throwing out the window everything I was expecting after reading _Baptism of Fire_. +Rats? Nope. +Mages? Some. +Ciri? Lots. +Geralt? Lots. +Sapkowski's craft improves with every book and I could not be happier. + +Let's start with the bad. +This book ignores most social commentary, which is a huge letdown. +With each passing book there's less and less of that. +Instead, we're getting better story, characters become more interesting and the story is actually gripping. +They are _better_ stories, but _worse_ books. +If it wasn't for the huge increase in quality of the story, I'd be disappointed and my day would be ruined. + +Now, the good. + +First thing that may surprise the reader: chronology is also thrown out the window. +We learn most of the story from Ciri's gossip _after_ it happened. +Guess Sapkowski became a bit bored with winning all the awards by just being there, so he tried to make it more difficult. +At first, I though that this will remove all the suspense - we know that Ciri will survive, but it fits the story. +It's not about if she gets through, but rather who she will be afterwards. + +And this is the second thing. +_Tower of Swallow_ aimes at different audience, I guess? +Not only is it not about social commentary, not only is not about things Witchers do, but it is no longer an adventure story (for a huge chunk of the text). +Ciri is having a very terrible time here. +She is captured, tortured and abused. +And even though Sapkowski makes it very clear that no sexual abuse is happening, it's still far from what I would expect. +The character of Ciri is also changing. +She is (rightfully) angry, spiteful and thirst for vengeance. +Basically, a teenager with a sword. + +The books becomes more and more gruesome. +Now, I love edgy stuff so every time Sapkowski describes mutilation, I am all for it. +It is, however, a stark change from the early Witcher stories. +We've got no humor, no fun. +Just pain and suffering. +Even Geralt at one point says that he is no longer a Witcher hunting monsters. +It's a completely different story. +And even if it's less adult oriented, with all the subtext removed - but it's more serious at the same. +The stake are higher, the risks are bigger. +I dig it. + +But the biggest problem at this point is CD Projekt. +We've got the games which take place _after_ the books. +We know that all the destruction, that everyone is talking about, will not have real consequences. +But even if this makes the entire series a bit pointless, it is still a pleasure to read. + +[^fn:1]: at least amongst us, nerds. |