summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/content-org/blog.org
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'content-org/blog.org')
-rw-r--r--content-org/blog.org34
1 files changed, 34 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/content-org/blog.org b/content-org/blog.org
index ea5090f..e22ae68 100644
--- a/content-org/blog.org
+++ b/content-org/blog.org
@@ -69,6 +69,40 @@ Love you, Drew!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7OsWuFo2jp4
+** Microsoft GitHub on Open Source
+
+Me, like many others, were lured into (non-MS) GitHub years ago.
+It was nicer than the entire competition - it worked better, it looked better, it was where *all* the Open Source lived.
+Well, not all.
+But it was standard for any new project to begin with creating a GitHub repository.
+
+But is stil a good idea?
+I don't think so.
+In fact, I think that Microsoft GitHub is the single worse place for Open Source to live.
+
+Funny think is, that only one thing changed - the owner.
+Microsoft, past-Balmmer era, in their "pro-open source" phase (mon! it's not a phase!) bought the single most important place for software.
+Not only software development, but software in general.
+It is near impossible to use sotware without thouching something that was stored on Microsoft Github.
+
+But, let's face it, Microsoft hasn't changed one bit.
+They may own Thorvald's soul and body but they are still actively against Open Source.
+
+Why do *care* about Open Source?
+It's not a popularity contest, it's a bullet point in CV.
+Open Souce is based on community, as groups of people who have nothing in common, join forces to create something.
+They may come from different backgrounds, location, believes, and so on.
+The one thing that connect them, is this project they are developing.
+
+(non-MS) GitHub was great for it.
+You had all the developers out there.
+You could collaborate with the entire world!
+GitHub was a great place to share code.
+
+But Microsoft Github is anythihg but that.
+
+
+
** DONE Broken system
CLOSED: [2024-10-16 Wed 22:28]
:PROPERTIES: