diff options
author | Michał M. Sapka <michal@sapka.me> | 2023-02-24 15:48:51 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Michał M. Sapka <michal@sapka.me> | 2023-02-24 15:48:51 +0100 |
commit | ad4b3b875aff4ebe8b8fa77fa2d309c0ff0cceb2 (patch) | |
tree | 6ee7e0e0af49d295ac5a3bf8d9a436c19bf7908f /content | |
parent | cd01ff3067989f833df44bff5bf67acf7d92ccf5 (diff) |
fix: remove extra line
Diffstat (limited to 'content')
-rw-r--r-- | content/2023/ai-generated-artwork-looses-copyright-protection.md | 1 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/content/2023/ai-generated-artwork-looses-copyright-protection.md b/content/2023/ai-generated-artwork-looses-copyright-protection.md index cfa919d..06ce411 100644 --- a/content/2023/ai-generated-artwork-looses-copyright-protection.md +++ b/content/2023/ai-generated-artwork-looses-copyright-protection.md @@ -10,7 +10,6 @@ tags: - machine-learning --- Today's most important news, even if you (just like me) have never even been to the USA. Via [Ars Technica](https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/02/us-copyright-office-withdraws-copyright-for-ai-generated-comic-artwork/) - > Based on the record before it, the Office concludes that the images generated by Midjourney contained within the Work are not original works of authorship protected by copyright. So, anyone can still use auto-generated images, but they can not be copyrighted. It makes sense, especially given the reasoning: |