diff options
author | mms <michal@sapka.me> | 2024-01-26 20:00:30 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | mms <michal@sapka.me> | 2024-01-26 20:00:30 +0100 |
commit | 95dfcd5740f7a134687bb8dbe7a6c5437edb8adb (patch) | |
tree | 248a3f75276cf53ad7bb32b3e55070b7c2db1dad /content/blog/2024/apple-dma.md | |
parent | 8420ad00bf70ddf03b878f8ef7a1970cdb81d26c (diff) |
feat: apple dma
Diffstat (limited to 'content/blog/2024/apple-dma.md')
-rw-r--r-- | content/blog/2024/apple-dma.md | 83 |
1 files changed, 83 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/content/blog/2024/apple-dma.md b/content/blog/2024/apple-dma.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..0800834 --- /dev/null +++ b/content/blog/2024/apple-dma.md @@ -0,0 +1,83 @@ ++++ +title = "Software devolution in the hands of Apple" +author = ["Michał Sapka"] +date = 2024-01-26T19:51:00+01:00 +categories = ["blog"] +draft = false +weight = 2001 +abstract = "Apple tries dodging creating user freedom once again" ++++ + +Let's go back some 60 years into the past. +Image buying a _mainframe_ computer for a low price of 200k USD. +You can not install any arbitrary software there, as the architecture is closed. +PC with its openness will come in some 30 years. +For now, you have bought machine, but you are also renting it. +Any changes require a dedicated team to come to your site. +You are also forced to pay constant fee every month for the privilege to use the machine. + +This was the standard way to _compute_ in the 60s. +But we have evolved. +Nowadays, you buy a computer and nothing keeps you from doing anything with it. + +Unless you bought it from Apple. +Yesterday the Big A dropped a news article[^fn:1] about how they will comply with Digital Markets Act[^fn:2]. + +In short: they Cook-ed it. +They fulfilled the letter of the law, completely bypassing any reasoning behind the act. +One may say: Apple made the Cookie popup of the DMA. + +Yes, external store will be possible and one may install[^fn:3] programs bypassing Apple App Store. +It may even be possible to bypass Apple requirements for programs this way. +Hooray? + +First of all: no _truly_ independent store will emerge. +Apple still needs to accept store before it is allowed to install anything. +And this comes with two requirements: + +- 0.5Eur fee for each first install from so-called "Core Technology Fee" [^fn:4]. +- 1 million EUR credit[^fn:4] [sic]. + Yup, to secure the above you need a letter of credit from a bank. + This ensures that no independent store, akin to F-Droid will emerge. + +But that's not all! +Apple requires that each version of you program distributed from different stores needs to be the same. +So, if you even think of having it _also_ on Apple App Store, you are forbidden from giving more freedom to a user in version sold _outside_. + +And with those two Catch-22 requirements Apple stopped any real user freedom on their platform. +You may create an independent, non-for-profit store if you have enough profits to do that. + +This goes against everything I believe in when it comes to _software_. +I want open computers empowering users, not closed ones guarding them. + +And the scariest part? +Some folks are defending this policy. +Sometimes I feel like a relict of the past. + +And I wonder how will they the botch opening iMessage. +I used to be an Apple fanboy. +I even owned an Airport Extreme. +But, as a father and person living from software development, I am at this point where I don't want to have anything to do with this company. + +I own an iPhone 13 Mini and I hate UI. +I am forced to work on an MacBook and I hate how little one can customize there. +I also own an AppleTV and the availability of programs there is a joke. + +I planned to _never_ buy an Apple device ever again. + +But with this I am no longer just an ex-fanboy. +I am now actively **against** what they do and what they stand for. +This is no longer the company I fell in love with[^fn:5]. +For some time we've been discovering that a single provider shouldn't control the entire chain. +Apple became the _worst_ enemy when it comes to software freedom simply because _they can_. +Little by little, they prove Stallman's take[^fn:6] is stop on. + +Wake me up when Linux is ready for everyday phone use, because Google is a poor alternative. + +[^fn:1]: [Apple announces changes to iOS, Safari, and the App Store in the European Union](https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2024/01/apple-announces-changes-to-ios-safari-and-the-app-store-in-the-european-union/) +[^fn:2]: [The Digital Markets Act on EC site](https://digital-markets-act.ec.europa.eu/index_en) +[^fn:3]: let's not call it "sideloading". +[^fn:4]: [Apple says third-party app marketplace creators must have €1,000,000 ‘letter of credit’](https://9to5mac.com/2024/01/25/apple-says-third-party-app-marketplace-creators-must-have-e1000000-letter-of-credit/) +[^fn:5]: yup, having any positive feelings towards a company is not a good idea. + Proven by case in point. +[^fn:6]: [Reasons not to use Apple](https://stallman.org/apple.html)
\ No newline at end of file |