diff options
author | mms <michal@sapka.me> | 2024-08-31 19:22:11 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | mms <michal@sapka.me> | 2024-08-31 19:22:11 +0200 |
commit | 091aa067d036ab60eb7d627d1997572daebaa310 (patch) | |
tree | d975c020497928a05ee30c257cfc88dc943cae76 /content-org/brain-rot.org | |
parent | bcf8aee086ae1c9e66a8ca461bf0912cda5d701d (diff) |
feat(blog): rrc
Diffstat (limited to 'content-org/brain-rot.org')
-rw-r--r-- | content-org/brain-rot.org | 119 |
1 files changed, 119 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/content-org/brain-rot.org b/content-org/brain-rot.org index 17fdb7e..906e0dc 100644 --- a/content-org/brain-rot.org +++ b/content-org/brain-rot.org @@ -2757,6 +2757,51 @@ Monitors reflected on glasses can not be not cool [fn:xf] But nothing is [fn:phreak] This movie is so old, that viewer is expected to know what a phreaker is! +*** TODO Hackers (1995) + +There are movies which I absolutely despised when I first saw them. +They were loud, abnoxious, made little sense. +Some of them, with passing time, grew on me. + +Hackers is a 1995 movie about, well, hackers. +We start with Dade, an 11 year old geek, being arrested for hacking and crashing over 1,5k computer systems. +He is sentenced to the worst imaginable sentence - an judge impossed mandated ban on using computer system till he reaches 18 years of age. +Somehow we don't care what happened during those years, as we jump 7 years in the future (which seem to be undefined "now" of 1990s). +Dade is hacking once again, and as a result he joins a hacker group and becomes part of an conspiracy. + +Say what you will, /Hackers/ takes the hacker ethos pretty seriously and this is what espaced my teenage understanding. +All main characters (using simply amazing handles, like Zero Cool or Cereal Killer) break into system for the fun of it. +They are prosecuted by the govermnent and media portrayes them as dangerous individuals, but they are anything but malificicet. + +Now, the hacking scenes make close to zero sense - but that's hollywood for you. +We haven't seen serious attempt at showing it before /Mr Robot/. +Therefore, we can see past it. + +But can't see past the fashion. +I have no idea /how/ anyone came with what we see here, but it's simply glorious. +Just look! +I refuse to believe, that this was not the official fashion of New York in the 90s. + +Also, the quotes. +If there is a infinitelly quotable movie, it is Hackers. +"/Hack the Planet/" or /"“There is no right and wrong. There's only fun and boring.”/ should be recognized by anyone working in IT. +I may be wrong, but I think there are questions about /Hackers/ on CompTIA Security+ + +Unfornatelly, there is a story here and it's not good. +The main villian is trying to get rich and put the blame on our hackers. +The plan makes little sense, that's one thing. +But everything about that particular screams /fake/. +He has the most over the top quotes and reactions - even if he has the only hacker-worthy keyboard to be seen here. + +/Hackers/ is a fun little movie, with a huge soul. +It's dumb, loud and over-stylized. +But it's also one the few movies which show the soul of a hacker. +I think everyone should see it at least once. + +#+begin_quote +You wage wars, murder, cheat, lie to us and try to make us believe it's for our own good, yet we're the criminals. Yes, I am a criminal. My crime is that of curiosity. +#+end_quote + ** Fantasy :PROPERTIES: @@ -2816,6 +2861,49 @@ CLOSED: [2024-04-14 Sun 18:10] Witcher #+end_menu +*** TODO Good Omens (Terry Pratchett and Neil Gaiman, 1990) + +But in the dark days o 1990 Terry Pratchet and Neil Gaiman decided to co-write a book - /Good Omens/, which itself will be a parody of the /Omen/ horror movie. +It was quite the popular movie back then, but nowaydays it may be a bit forgotten. + +Pratchet & Gaiman seem like a great combo. +The first one is a great story /teller/, while the later tend to privide better /stories/. +They are also both imagitable authors of speculative fiction. + +The general idea of the story of the book follows the one from the book: due to satanits shananings, antichrist is born to a family in power. +The end of times in near. +But, unlike the movie, it is not be stopped by a detective but by an unlikely pair of an angel and and a daemon. +None of the wants to see the apocalypse, so they join forces to stop the antichrist - who turns out to be quite a nice kid. + +for me a computer nerd, the process of writing such book fascinates me. +It's 1990 so no cooperative tooling exists yet, therefor Terry and Neil sent discettes to each other. +How cool is that! + +#+begin_quote +I think this is an honest account of the process of writing Good Omens. +It was fairly easy to keep track of because of the way we sent disks to one another, and because I was Keeper of the Official Master Copy I can say that I wrote a bit over two thirds of Good Omens. +-- Terry Pratchett +#+end_quote + +and it shows. +/Good Omens/ does not read like joint venture, it's distincly Pratchett. +You get Gaimaon love for the macabre and over-convoluted story, but if he was removed the cover I woud have never guessed. +There is a scene of mass shooting, which is something fitting /American Gods/ but it's written like we're in Ankh-Morpork. + +It's not part of the /Discworld/ world, but on the surface it could have easily been. +The humor is there, the unlreated description which turn out be introduction to related thingys and so on. +But the world of /Discworld/ is more interesteing, crazier. +In that series we've got insane world and insane characters which try to remain sane. +/Good Omen/ however happens in our, boring world and most of the characters are "normal", but they act insane. +But /Discworld/ has its own multiverse, so it fits. + +But since it's got two autors, it a bit on the longer side. +Just enough to overstay its welcome. +Pratchett is a master of the word, but his stories are rarely interesting - and I was never a fan of Gaiman. +I didn't found what is told here much interesting, I was not curious how they will stop the apocalypse. +Nothing unexpected happened. +If it was 2/3 of the current size, if some of the crust was removed, it would be a better book, as the general idea is very cool. +But even at current state it's very enjoyable and well worth the read /if/ you like Pratchett's style. ** Modern Games :PROPERTIES: @@ -3318,3 +3406,34 @@ If anything, it's /Magnum P.I./ of the genre. [fn:cover] or whatever your edition has [fn:tolkien] hello Tolkien + + + +*** TODO Guns of Avalon (Roger Zelazny, 1972) +The fastest fantasy in the wild west continues where we left off. +Corwin espaped his prison, and armed with newly regrown eyes, he is ready for his revange. + +/Chronicles of Amber/ are like nothing I've ever read. +Mostly because I've never been into fantasy, but still. +At no point of /Guns of Avalon/ nor of /Nine Princes in Amber/ have I felt that I'm reading a published book. +It's rather what I would imagine as a synopsis of the book. + +Characters? Screw them, they ony serve a purpose. +The world? Screw it, let's create it as we go. +Magic system? I am sure not even Zelazny has any idea how it works at this point. + +But at the same time I can't stop reading it. +From outside, those two books I've finished sound like pulp. +But there is so much going on, and those things happen fast. + +Corwin's goal this time is to buy carabins from Royal Air Force and retake Amber. +Yup - this magical being, from an eternal family, who is able to travel between dimensions[fn:shadows], whose eyes just regrown, is planning to retake a magical land using firearms. +And somehow it all makes sense. + +/Guns/ serve as direct continuation of the first book, but the ending paints a different route the series seems to be heading. +I am very much invested and I interested what's going to happen. +I should hate this book, but I love it. + +Zelazny, you were a strange writer indeed. + +[fn:shadows] or whatever Shadows are |